Disposal Concepts Options Assessment and Selection
Editorial support to revise the RWM Concepts Status Report (2017)
MCM has been contracted by RWM to revise their draft Concepts Status Report, to address peer review comments and capture new work related to concept options and design developments to assess technology maturity and assessment tools. As the UK GDF siting process progresses, a successive programme of optioneering and optimisation will be undertaken to ensure that the most appropriate disposal concepts are selected and developed for the chosen site. The diagram below illustrates the potential for use of several concept options to be used for different wastes within one facility.
Evaluating technical practicability and feasibility of disposal options for RWM (2014)
MCM, with their partners Wood, have completed a series of workshops with RWM to assess the maturity of available technology options for a number of disposal concept options, including Silos and Mined-borehole Matrices, covering a range of siting scenarios and potential UK host rocks. International experts with experience of developing and implementing advanced disposal solutions have provided input resulting in detailed tables listing factors impacting technical feasibility against components of each disposal option – as illustrated below. When site specific geological conditions are determined by the UK GDF Siting Process, more precise and detailed evaluations of the technical feasibility and practicability of implementing concept options can be made. The information prepared in this work will be used as a part of the concepts knowledge base to support these as part of the RWM Concept Selection Process.
JAEA undertake disposal concept comparison for the direct disposal of spent fuel in Japan (2014)
MCM has led a study with QJ Science (formerly Quintessa Japan) for JAEA to consider a range of disposal concepts. A number of design variants were considered and assessed against the reference KBS-3V disposal concept, including different container overpack options and cavern layout options. The work involved preparation of concepts information for JAEA teams (covering R&D, performance assessment and design) and application of multi-attribute analysis software to aid visualisation of assessment outputs, as illustrated below.
UK geological disposal concept options for spent fuel, high level waste and intermediate level waste (2008)
MCM, with their partners Galson Sciences and Neall Consulting Ltd, were contracted by the NDA to review disposal options under consideration internationally for the disposal of higher activity radioactive wastes, including Spent Fuel, High-level Waste and Intermediate Level Waste. The two review reports (SF/HLW and ILW) were published by NDA in 2008 have since become key reports to underpin their selection and definition of illustrative disposal concepts used in the RWM generic Disposal System Safety Case (gDSSC).
Support to NDA for international meeting to discuss disposal concepts for spent fuel and high level waste (2007)
MCM provided the lead support to NDA to manage an international gathering of experts to participate in a concept options meeting focused on discussing issues surrounding high-level radioactive waste (HLW) and spent nuclear fuel (SF). A primary objective of the workshop was to gain a better understanding of how other countries have approached a justification for the selected repository concept and how the respective regulators have been involved in this process. The workshop involved representatives from several European waste management organisations and regulatory authorities, together with UK regulators, NDA staff and UK contractors working in the field of radioactive waste management. In the main report, twelve generic disposal concepts are described and assessed against a set of evaluation factors, intended to reflect the range
of considerations involved in making choices between options. It is emphasised that the selection of a preferred concept is inappropriate at such an early stage in the siting process, and that the details of an optimised final design might be considerably different when adapted to specific site conditions.